{"id":4066,"date":"2019-12-02T16:44:08","date_gmt":"2019-12-02T14:44:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/journal-ene.gr\/?p=4066"},"modified":"2019-12-09T21:51:13","modified_gmt":"2019-12-09T19:51:13","slug":"comparison-of-self-reported-adherence-to-cervical-and-breast-cancer-screening-guidelines-in-relation-to-the-researchers-profession","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/comparison-of-self-reported-adherence-to-cervical-and-breast-cancer-screening-guidelines-in-relation-to-the-researchers-profession\/","title":{"rendered":"Comparison of self-reported adherence to cervical and breast cancer screening guidelines in relation to the researcher\u2019s profession."},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 46\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>ABSTRACT<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Introduction:<\/strong> Self-reporting is a major and, in many cases, the only feasible method to use in cancer screening research. However, its validity has been questioned and numerous studies indicate that women over-report their participation in preventive Pap-test and mammography screenings.<br \/>\nAim: The objective of this study was to determine whether individuals report in the same way their Pap-test and mammography screening behaviors when the interviews are conducted by researchers of different professions, in this case a social worker and a general practitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Methods:<\/strong> Two studies assessing adherence to cervical and breast cancer screening guidelines were conducted during late 2006 &#8211; early 2007 in the same 114 women in Crete, Greece. Kappa coefficient was used to measure the agreement of participants\u2019 answers to the same questions between the two interviewers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Results:<\/strong> Only 32 out of 90 (35,5%) of the women replied that \u2018have had at least one\u2019 gynecological exam respectively in both studies (Kappa=0.189, p&lt;0.001). Agreement was also weak (Kappa=0.386 and 0.235) for self-reported mammography and Pap smear tests in the last 6 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in major demographic characteristics between women who provided, or not, the same answers in both interviewers, apart from the self-reported health status (p=0.032).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Conclusions:<\/strong> Women overestimated their self-reported adherence to cancer screening guidelines when the interviewer was a doctor once their responses were matched to those given to a social worker. The professional identities of the researchers that perform the data collection should be made explicit to make comparison across studies more accurate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Keywords:<\/strong> adherence, cancer, gynecological tests, rater&#8217;s agreement, self-reported health<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/EPISTIMONIKO-12-3-arthro6.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>Full Article (Download PDF)<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ABSTRACT Introduction: Self-reporting is a major and, in many cases, the only feasible method to use in cancer screening research. However, its validity has been questioned<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1116],"tags":[1134,1131,1132,1133,714,1130],"eidos-arthrou":[],"keyword":[],"language":[],"class_list":["post-4066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iss_3_12","tag-anastasios-philalithis","tag-antonis-koutis","tag-athanasios-alegakis","tag-evangelia-panagoulopoulou","tag-george-kritsotakis","tag-maria-moudatsou"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4066"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4066\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4103,"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4066\/revisions\/4103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4066"},{"taxonomy":"eidos-arthrou","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/eidos-arthrou?post=4066"},{"taxonomy":"keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/keyword?post=4066"},{"taxonomy":"language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/periodiko.yaba.gr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/language?post=4066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}